dissabte 11 de febrer de 2012

Leancamp Barcelona. Wow!

I've just returned from the Leancamp held in Barcelona and I needed to write some lines. When I registered for this event I wasn't sure what was that about, but the idea of Lean and that the guys from Agile Barcelona where eager to attend was enough for me. Moreover, I was convincing other friends to attend (and I succeeded on that, I have to say).

I thought I needed to prepare myself for the event and I decided to read The Lean Startup (the book that inspired the movement). What a great book full of ideas! Once read, I knew a little more what I was going to find, and finding among the speakers Angel Medianilla and Alex Barrera I was sure It was going to be amazing. And it has been so.
Opening session. Picture by @leancamp

Leancamp is an unconference, and it means something like an Open Space: there are a lot of parallel tracks and you can attend to the ones you like most. But the most important part is the Law Of Two Feet: if you feel you cannot bring anything to a session or the session cannot bring anything to you, you are responsible of using your two feet and go somewhere else.
Morning talks. Picture by @nickycast

With such a bunch of interesting people it has been very difficult to choose among the sessions but I'll try to share my experience.

Introducing the Lean Startup
The first session I attended was given by Rob Fitzpatrick introducing the Lean Startup ideas using a concrete start-up in London which links big companies with street artists. Low funding, invest on User Experience, use money when needed, question everything, build metrics on your own questions.
It's been an exciting talk, but 25 minutes has been too short for his message.

Human Side of Lean
Angel Medianilla knows how to handle time, even though his hangover. He has explained the history of NUMMI, a General Motors plant that was recovered when run by Toyota people. Then he went on to a Japanese poem about three warlords and a bird that didn't sing. The furious Nobunaga, the  persuader Hideyoshi and quiet Tokugawa.
"If a bird doesn't sing, kill it", said Nobunaga.
"If a bird doesn't sing, make it sing", said Hideyoshi.
"If a bird doesn't sing, wait for it to", said Tokugawa.
Angel says that lean is more like Tokugawa (and, by the way, Tokugawa won).
Afterwards Angel defined "corporate culture": the way we do things around here. And he said that for it to work people needs two things: a noble cause, a purpose and shared values.
Great Talk!

Bumble Bee-ing
The third session I have been a Bumble Bee in the sense of Open Space Technology: I've used my two feet and I've gone to different groups: User Experience, Aikido and starting a start-up. It's been interesting merging the concepts behind Aikido and Lean. I've been translating some Aikido concepts to Judo, my own background, and everything works the same way.
Aikido and Lean. Picture by @CarlosTheSailor
Metrics
Fourth session has been  with a guy with a hat named Andreas Klinger, who is CWTFO of LOOKK. He's shared with us the lessons learned with metrics, measuring users accessing his site. He said to focus on Retention, because the good measure is User Happiness, and it's the best way to measure it. He explained a the concept of cohorts that's used in Lean Startup (a group of people based on some attribute) and in the end he went to AARRR: the sound of looking at metrics. No, but he explains it better with his slides on slideshare.
He didn't managed time, but the talk was very, very good.

Scrum + Kanban
Again with Angel Medianilla we started to talk about Kanban. First of all he played with us and we performed the game of writing names (good exercise to understand "one project at a time"). He went to the 5 principles of Lean:
1.Value for your customer  (anything else is Waste). If you don't want more of this, it is waste.
2. Stream
3. Pull
4. Flow
5. Kaizen

Then to the principles of Kanban:
1. Value Stream
2. Visualize Work
3. Limit WIP
4. Flow
5. Improve

This time I took profit of the talk because of my previous knowledge on the subject, but it was hard to fit all that stuff in 25 minutes (game included).

Visual Thinking
Esther Gons (@wilg) was running this talk that I was expecting so much, but it ended up just explaining Andreas Klinger LOOKK story. Interesting, but not that much. I'll read The Back of the Napkin, which is on my reading backlog anyway. 

Learning, Knowledge Management and Innovation
Pic by @CarlosTheSailor
Again with Angel Medianilla, but this time on a more practical session: tools and techniques for sharing and creating knowledge. And just Wikis don't work, he says. The most important thing, we know it, is the interaction between individuals.

Retrospectives. Talking about Kaizen (continuous improvement) and Haisen (continuous reflection), and the importance of having a plan after a retro.

Pairing. Not only pair programming, but anything. He suggested Pair PowerPointing. Share mistakes and learn from failure.

Lab time. Invest a fraction of the team time on labs, to learn and improve. Angel suggested his blog just for Lab suggestions (I'll try to find the proper link).

Brainstorming. And first of all, learn about how to do it.

And the audience suggested other interesting things.
Slack.
Go analog!. And the link http://manualthinking.com/
Lightning talks. And Pecha Kucha presentations (20 seconds for 20 slides).
Demos.

A lot of interesting stuff!

And That's all
This is the first of the three great Lean-Agile events going to be held in Barcelona. ALE and Scrum Gathering are coming to town on August and October. I'll be informing.

Other Links and Reviews



dimarts 7 de febrer de 2012

The Lean Startup

How Today's Enterpreneurs Use Continuous Innovation to Create Radically Successful Businesses
De Eric Ries. 2011. Publicado por Crown Business. 336 páginas


Eric Ries define una startup como "una institución humana diseñada para crear un nuevo producto o servicio bajo condiciones de extrema incertidumbre", sin entrar en detalles respecto al tamaño o al sector. Entiende que hay emprendedores dentro de compañías ya establecidas (intrapreneurs), e incluso que puede haber en el sector público.

El Lean Startup es una aproximación para desarrollar startups exitosas, utilizando de forma más creativa el talento y el capital, inspirados por los principios del Lean Manufacturing.

No conviene perder demasiado tiempo en estudios de mercado, sino poner en marcha el producto lo más rápidamente posible (un MVP, Producto Mínimo Viable). Propone crear experimentos, que ya son el producto, de manera que puedas obtener información de su aceptación cuanto antes. El objetivo del experimento es aprender y validar el aprendizaje.

Una vez tienes tu proyecto en marcha evaluar si vas por el buen camino: perseverar o pivotar. Y pivotar no es abandonar, sino hacer un cambio aprovechando lo aprendido hasta el momento. Parece ser que la idea de pivotar se ha vuelto tan conocida que hasta en el New Yorker le dedicaron la viñeta.

El salto de fe, la hipótesis de valor y la hipótesis de crecimiento, el ciclo Construir-Medir-Aprender, las vanity metrics, los split-tests, los tipos de pivot, los mototres de crecimiento, la historia de los sobres,... Este libro contiene tantas perlas y está escrito de una forma tan brillantemente estructurada que lo convierte en una lectura muy recomendable.

Este mismo sábado, en La Salle deBarcelona, habrá un encuentro relacionado con Lean Startup, el Leancamp, con mucha gente interesante y muchas ganas de aprender. Nos vemos allí.




dimarts 24 de gener de 2012

Is The Lean Startup just Mud-Throwing Practice?

I'm reading The Lean Startup book (you should read it as well) and the author suggests that you should release your web as soon as possible despite it's not complete. This way maybe you engage some early adopters. After releasing something you can watch if your assumptions were right and adapt accordingly.

When reading this it came to my mind an old post by Jakob Nielsen (a usability guru) dated from 2000: The Mud-Throwing Theory of Usability. Moreover, I remember watching him in London explaining it theatrically. His theory suggested that some people were building sites like throwing mud at the wall and see if it sticks.

He, in 2000, advocated for some usability practices, just a minimum (paper-prototyping and testing with few users), before releasing anything. Does it contradict The Lean Startup ideas? Not at all, I would say.

In 2000 usability and user experience weren't as known as they are now and Jakob Nielsen was just making them widespread (and selling his services). Currently developers and designers have assumed the importance of users. When Eric Ries (the author of The Lean Startup) suggests to release as soon as possible, he talks about the MVP, Minimum Viable Product, and without usability tests it could not be "viable".

How much to invest in those tests would depend who you ask. Keep it Lean.

dimarts 17 de gener de 2012

Las cinco disfunciones de un equipo

De Patrick Lencioni. 2002. Publicado por Empresa Activa (Urano). 215 páginas

El autor presenta sus ideas de cómo transformar un equipo que no funciona en forma de fábula: una empresa que no funciona contrata a una directora general para conseguir que sus ejecutivos funcionen como equipo. A través de esta historia el autor explica lo que él considera que son los cinco problemas que tienen los equipos.

La novelita (175 páginas del libro), aunque al final tiene diálogos imposibles, tiene buen ritmo y es entretenida. Justo después el autor ha añadido la explicación de las cinco disfunciones y sugerencias para corregirlas.

Las cinco disfunciones de un equipo (según el autor) son:
1. Ausencia de confianza. Los miembros del equipo deberían conocerse bien y confiar unos en otros.
2. Temor al conflicto. Los conflictos son productivos y no hay que huir de ellos.
3. Falta de compromiso. Una vez se toma una decisión, todos la aceptan como si fuese suya.
4. Falta de responsabilidad. Todos los miembros del equipo deben pedir cuentas a los que no funcionan.
5. Falta de atención a los resultados. Hay que dejar claros y perseguir los resultados colectivos.

Qué quieres que te diga. Después de haber leído el Management 3.0 todo esto es muy Management 1.0. Habla de recompensar al equipo económicamente por los resultados, de fijar plazos de entrega para que el equipo funcione o de presionar al equipo. Y continuamente habla del "líder".

Nada empowering, ni auto-organización, ni nada por el estilo. Estamos de acuerdo en la diferencia entre "grupos de personas" y "equipos", y también acepto las dos primeras disfunciones, pero poco más.

Además, puede que las ediciones de "Empresa Activa", todas iguales, te predispongan en contra de un libro, y puede que sea mi caso. Si has leído alguno que ya no te ha gustado, empiezas condicionado.